I'd like the panel to discuss the conflict of interest re: the New York Times Jerusalem Bureau Chief Ethan Bronner. Bronner's son serves in the Israeli Defense Forces and readers alerted the New...

Ainsley out as Boston Globe publisher, retires at 57
The New York Times has announced that Publisher Steve Ainsley - on whose watch the Boston Globe slipped from being the region's premier news organization to a struggling, demoralized unit that at one point faced the possibility of extinction - will retire at the end of the year and be replaced by Chris Mayer, the current Senior V.P. for circulation and operations.
In an announcement released through Business Wire, Times Company CEO Janet Robinson chose to accentuate the positive about the 57-year-old Ainsley's tenure. She credited him in particular with pulling the paper through tough negotiations with employee unions - negotiations that included a threat that the paper could be shut down - that netted the Times $20 million in concessions.
"Over the past year Steve has shepherded a comprehensive financial strategy that has significantly strengthened the Globe and Boston.com and enhanced its ability to provide the New England community with high-quality news and information," Robinson said.
The Globe's Beth Healy reports that Mayer's job has been to oversee circulation, information technology, production, and distribution. He was also the "architect" of the recent circulation price increase that has helped the paper shore up its shaky finances, Healy writes.
(Click "continue" to read more)
On a personal note, I was working for the Globe in 2006 when Ainsley took over for then-publisher Richard Gilman, who also retired as the Globe's fortunes were clearly sliding.
By then, it was clear to almost everyone on Morrissey Boulevard that the Globe was facing monumental problems with the decline of advertising revenue and the migration of readers to the web. No one knew much about Ainsley, so of course there was a heightened sense of anticipation as we crowded into an auditorium to meet what we hoped was a dynamic, forward-thinking leader who could bend the Globe's arc in a positive direction once again.
What we got was a seeming nice guy who spouted some management-seminar boilerplate about "reinventing" the newspaper and "listening" to employee suggestions. As I walked out, I felt as deflated as a week-old birthday balloon. I remember turning to a friend and saying: "We are so screwed."
Could someone other than Ainsley have done a better job, given the powerful economic forces working against newspapers like the Globe? Maybe not. Would that someone just have been following and implementing orders from the New York Times? Maybe so. But the kicker to the Steve Ainsley story is: We'll never know.






Comments
Ainsley's got a golden parachute to land softly - offshore, of course.
And a professorial gig awaiting at Hahvud.
He's set for life.
Thanks Ralph,
and Thks for the personal insight.
ST: Globe Still in Trouble at the Top
It doesn't look like Times Management has decided they, via Globe Management Control, are doing anything wrong. A Shake-Up person would be nice in the Globe's situation.
Usually when companies go this type of management succession route it means that they think the previous person was doing a good/adequate job.
Hi Once more Ralph,
ST: Don't Like Globe's new Delivery pricing, Customer Service.
I don't think he did a good job with pricing. For years I used to be able to get better and better deals as I went out to about 26 weeks. This meant the Globe had my money early and could earn on it. Now it is getting to the point of only convenience.
Another thing is firing US people and replacing them with India/Pakistan to handle billing and problems. They are a pain and only know how to communicate via script. I tried to pay my bill early recently and they didn't know how so I had to go around them back into the Globe.
If that is what he did in that department, watch out for more poor choices.